On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 08:52:05PM -0400, alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote: > Yeah, that's becoming my conclusion too -- undo that, and start from > scratch using the other idea.
That's about 515e3d8, right? I have not looked in details at what you have here, but this produces a compilation warning on Windows for me with this part of the patch: +RegisterSegmentBoundary(XLogSegNo seg, XLogRecPtr endpos) +{ + XLogSegNo segno PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY; segno gets to be an unreferenced local variable. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature