From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for the > > same. > > > > I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as this > is not > reported by any user and we have found it during code review so it seems > either users don't have an exact use case or they haven't noticed this yet. > What > do you people think about back-patching?
Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch. > Attached, please find a slightly updated patch with minor changes. I have > slightly changed the test to make it more meaningful. The patch looks good to me. Best regards, Hou zj
