On 9/7/21, 11:38 PM, "Julien Rouhaud" <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 6:36 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossa...@amazon.com> wrote: >> >> I'd like to gauge interest in parallelizing the archiver process. >> [...] >> Based on previous threads I've seen, I believe many in the community >> would like to replace archive_command entirely, but what I'm proposing >> here would build on the existing tools. > > Having a new implementation that would remove the archive_command is > probably a better long term solution, but I don't know of anyone > working on that and it's probably gonna take some time. Right now we > have a lot of users that face archiving bottleneck so I think it would > be a good thing to implement parallel archiving, fully compatible with > current archive_command, as a short term solution.
Thanks for chiming in. I'm planning to work on a patch next week. Nathan
