On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 7:33 PM Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 22, 2021, at 6:39 AM, Amul Sul <sula...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, that is a bit longer, here is the snip from v35-0010 patch > > Right, that's longer, and only tests one interaction. The isolation spec I > posted upthread tests multiple interactions between the session which uses > cursors and the system going read-only. Whether the session using a cursor > gets a FATAL, just an ERROR, or neither depends on where it is in the process > of opening, using, closing and committing. I think that's interesting. If > the implementation of the ALTER SESSION READ ONLY feature were to change in > such a way as, for example, to make the attempt to open the cursor be a FATAL > error, you'd see a change in the test output. >
Agreed. Regards, Amul
