> On Oct 3, 2021, at 10:04 AM, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 2, 2021, at 10:32 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 4:49 AM PG Bug reporting form >> <nore...@postgresql.org> wrote: >>> Although you can add --exclude-relation=*.pg_temp*.*, this behaviour differs >>> from the behaviour of pg_dump and friends, which skip such relations >>> silently. >> >> I agree -- this behavior is a bug. >> >> Can you propose a fix, Mark? > > The attached patch includes a test case for this, which shows the problems > against the current pg_amcheck.c, and a new version of pg_amcheck.c which > fixes the bug. Could you review it? > > Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Reposting to pgsql-hackers in preparation for making a commitfest entry.
v1-0001-Bug-fix-do-not-check-temp-tables-from-pg_amcheck.patch
Description: Binary data
— Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
