Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> It's clear that we must use 'unsigned char' instead of 'char'
>>>> and corrected version runs ok on both systems. That's why I suspect
>>>> that gcc 2.95.2 has different default under FreeBSD which could
>>>> cause problem with LC_CTYPE in 7.0.2
>>
>> I think Peter recently went around and inserted explicit casts to
>> fix this problem. Please do see if it's fixed in CVS.
> Hmm, current cvs has the same problem :-(
Now that I look at it, what Peter was doing was just trying to eliminate
compiler warnings on some platform or other, and he made changes like
these (this example is interfaces/ecpg/preproc/pgc.l):
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@
/* this should leave the last byte set to '\0' */
strncpy(lower_text, yytext, NAMEDATALEN-1);
for(i = 0; lower_text[i]; i++)
- if (isascii((unsigned char)lower_text[i]) && isupper(lower_text[i]))
+ if (isascii((int)lower_text[i]) && isupper((int) lower_text[i]))
lower_text[i] = tolower(lower_text[i]);
if (i >= NAMEDATALEN)
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@
/* skip the ";" and trailing whitespace. Note that yytext contains
at least one non-space character plus the ";" */
- for ( i = strlen(yytext)-2; i > 0 && isspace(yytext[i]); i-- ) {}
+ for ( i = strlen(yytext)-2; i > 0 && isspace((int) yytext[i]); i-- ) {}
yytext[i+1] = '\0';
for ( defptr = defines; defptr != NULL &&
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@
/* skip the ";" and trailing whitespace. Note that yytext contains
at least one non-space character plus the ";" */
- for ( i = strlen(yytext)-2; i > 0 && isspace(yytext[i]); i-- ) {}
+ for ( i = strlen(yytext)-2; i > 0 && isspace((int) yytext[i]); i-- ) {}
yytext[i+1] = '\0';
yyin = NULL;
Peter, I suppose what you were trying to clean up is a "char used as
array subscript" kind of warning? These changes wouldn't help Oleg's
problem, in fact the first change in this file would have broken code
that was previously not broken for him.
I think that the correct coding convention is to be careful to call the
<ctype.h> macros only with values that are either declared as or casted
to "unsigned char". I would like to think that your compiler will not
complain about
if (isascii((unsigned char)lower_text[i]) ...
If it does we'd have to write something as ugly as
if (isascii((int)(unsigned char)lower_text[i]) ...
which I can see no value in from a portability standpoint.
regards, tom lane
