> > Indice's TIDs are transient. > > Isn't it useless to store indice's TIDs ? > > but yes Hiroshi is right. Index TID is transient. I first looked > into pg sources two weeks ago so I have still holes in my knowledge. > So that only solution is to traverse it .. It was discussed several times for btree - add heap tid to index key and you'll scan index for particulare tuple much faster. Not sure what could be done for hash indices... order hash items with the same hash key? Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new... Devik
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster wit... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faste... Devik
- Re: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faste... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index sc... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index sc... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index sc... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index sc... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index sc... Mikheev, Vadim