Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?

[Hiroshi Inoue]

"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote: > > > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked > > > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ? > > > > Nope. It has been broken a long time... > > Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X. > Hiroshi? > Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS? > Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached. > > Vadim > 2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3 > Hmm,it seems that both current and REL7_0_PATCHES have already been changed. I committed the the change to current tree and asked Tatsuo to commit it to REL7_0_PATCHES tree. Regards. Hiroshi Inoue