> You'll probably recall that the ambiguity between NOT NULL and NOT
> DEFERRABLE gave us similar problems.  We were able to get around that
> by pretending NOT DEFERRABLE is an independent clause and leaving some
> of the parsing work to be done by analyze.c, but I don't think that
> trick will work here.
> 
> I seem to recall a third case where a lookahead would have helped,
> but can't find the details in the archives right now.
> 
> I think it's time to bite the bullet and put in a lookahead filter.
> What say you?

Hmmm.  Not real excited about that for performance reasons.  Other options?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Reply via email to