> Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On a somewhat related note, what about the NO_SECURITY defines > > strewn throughout the backend? Does anyone run the server with > > NO_SECURITY defined? And if so, what benefit is that over just > > running with everything owned by the same user? > > I suppose the idea was to avoid expending *any* cycles on security > checks if you didn't need them in your particular situation. But > offhand I've never heard of anyone actually using the feature. I'm > dubious whether the amount of time saved would be worth the trouble. NO_SECURITY define removed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
