Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> That is what now() is defined to return: transaction start time.
> Then CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is in violation of SQL.
Au contraire, if it did not behave that way it would violate the spec.
See SQL92 6.8 general rule 3:
3) If an SQL-statement generally contains more than one reference
to one or more <datetime value function>s, then all such ref-
erences are effectively evaluated simultaneously. The time of
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
evaluation of the <datetime value function> during the execution
of the SQL-statement is implementation-dependent.
regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] time stops within transaction Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transaction Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transaction John Huttley
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transaction Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transaction Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transaction Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within transact... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within tra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops within... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops wi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops wi... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops wi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops wi... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] time stops wi... Vadim Mikheev
