Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What we could do is ship the dependencies (.deps/*.P) in the tarball. > That would require running an entire build before making a tarball, but it > would be a nice service to users. Hm. It might be handy for people not using gcc, since they'd have no easy way to build dependencies for themselves. Do you have an idea how much it'd bloat the tarball to do that? regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; make variable... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; make... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; ... Peter Eisentraut
- make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming attra... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming attra... Tom Lane
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Coming a... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS] Com... Tom Lane
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS]... Brook Milligan
- Re: make depend (Re: [HACKERS]... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Coming attractions: VPATH build; make... Bruce Momjian