Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've done bit more research. <xti.h> was the correct place to find > TCP_NODELAY in UNIX98/SUSv2. However in the Austin Group draft of the > next version of POSIX and UNIX0x/SUSv3, XTI has been dropped and > <netinet/tcp.h> officially included. OK, thanks for following up on that. >> to revert the whole patch and instead make configure's test for >> availability of <netinet/tcp.h> first include <netinet/in.h>, so >> that that configure test will succeed on IRIX etc. > I agree with this. Back out the patch and update configure.in. Will do. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Larry Rosenman
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Pete Forman
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h&... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h&... Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xt... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support for &... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add support f... Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Add suppo... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: Add support for <xti.h> Pete Forman