* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001025 13:20]: > > Oh, so it wouldn't be a search path but a specific executable name > (with or without full path info). OK, that makes sense to me. > I've had different perls installed with different executable names > myself. Bingo. Larry
- [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Larry Rosenman
- [HACKERS] Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefe... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefe... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? Bruce Momjian
