At 08:59 9/11/00 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
>> Just seems like we'd be forcing non-standard syntax on 
>> ourselves when/if
>> CREATE DATABASE becomes CREATE SCHEMA;
>
>I do not think this will be the way.
>

I know there was a lot of discussion of this a while ago, but was there a
consistant set of decisions made? 

I'd be very interested if someone could post the current thinking re:
schemas, catalogs, and environments, because the way I read the SQL99 docs,
the catalog seems to correspond to a single postgres installation, and a
schema seems to correspond to a postgres database (ie. tables and views are
defined in a schema, and schemas are defined in a catalog, and catalogs are
defined in an environment, and it looks like the environment is akin to the
file system/implementation & postmaster). 

Presumably this was raised before, but I'd love to see the consensus view,
if it is documented.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/

Reply via email to