> > We need the 7.0 style for compatibility with other DB's. Postgres was > > "the" pioneer in this area, but similar functionality is now available in other >DB's. > > Could you explain? PostgreSQL cant be compatible in C level, why > the SQL compatibility? (I mean the LANGUAGE 'C' specifically) C code compatible with Informix: int32 intadd (int32 a, int32 b) { return a + b; } This is the same code that was standard in PostgreSQL 7.0 Andreas
- AW: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function la... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' functi... Marko Kreen
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' functi... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' fu... 'Marko Kreen'
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC... mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs '... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C'... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping with... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... 'Marko Kreen'
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Coping ... Ross J. Reedstrom
- AW: [HACKERS] Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' functi... Zeugswetter Andreas SB