Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, and to make matters that much worse, on a RedHat system it doesn't > matter if you build with or without --enable-locale -- locale support is > in the libc used, and locale support gets used regardless of what you > select on the configure line :-(. I don't follow. Of course locale support is in libc; where else would it be? But without --enable-locale, we will never call setlocale(). Surely even RedHat is not so broken that they default to non-C locale in a program that has not called setlocale()? That directly contravenes the letter of the ISO C standard, IIRC. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too many... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report too m... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug report t... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug repo... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE bug ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LOCALE... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LO... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LO... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's one LO... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] OK, that's on... Tom Lane