Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > select ('today', interval '1 day') OVERLAPS ('yesterday', interval '18 > hours'); > (the second one fails). Now that I look, this breakage was introduced in > March when "we" expunged operators allowed as identifiers (Tom Lane and > I have blood on our hands on this one ;) See gram.y around line 5409. I see it does fail, but I'm at a complete loss to understand why, especially given that the first case still works. The grammar looks perfectly fine AFAICT. Can you explain what's wrong here? regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsq... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-no... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsq... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on ... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs inte... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterval vs... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: FWD: tinterva... Thomas Lockhart