> Now, given the two components, each with very low costs, it chooses to > do a sequential scan on the table. I don't get it. Read the FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#4.23 "4.23) Why are my subqueries using IN so slow?") - Andrew
- [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] SQL 'in' vs join. Tom Lane
- Andrew Snow