On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:42:24PM -0600, Junfeng Zhang wrote: > I am new to postgreSQL. When I read the documents, I find out the Postmaster > daemon actual spawns a new backend server process to serve a new client > request. Why not use threads instead? Is that just for a historical reason, > or some performance/implementation concern? Once all the questions regarding "why not" have been answered, it would be good to also ask "why use threads?" Do they simplify the code? Do they offer significant performance or efficiency gains? What do they give, other than being buzzword compliant? -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Myron Scott
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Myron Scott
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Myron Scott
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Myron Scott
- [HACKERS] Re: Using Threads? mlw
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Adam Haberlach
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Dan Lyke
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Junfeng Zhang
- Re: [HACKERS] Using Threads? Tom Samplonius