On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:52:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> There aren't going to be all that many data pages needing the COW
> treatment, because the postmaster uses very little data space of its
> own. I think this would become an issue if we tried to have the
> postmaster pre-cache catalog information for backends, however (see
> my post elsewhere in this thread).
Would that pre-cached data not be placed in a SHM segment? Such
segments don't do COW, so this would be a non-issue.
--
Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/
PGP signature
