Re: [HACKERS] Need help with phys backed shm segments (Postgresql+FreeBSD).

[Alfred Perlstein]

* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 08:37] wrote:
> BTW, I just remembered that in 7.0.*, the SLocks that are managed by
> SpinAcquire() all live in their own little shm segment.  On a machine
> where slock_t is char, it'd likely only amount to 128 bytes or so.
> Maybe you are seeing some bug in FreeBSD's handling of tiny shm
> segments?

Good call, i think I found it! :)

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."