Now that the postmaster takes a noticeable amount of time to shut down, I'm wondering if pg_ctl's default about whether or not to wait ought to be reversed. That is, "-w" would become the norm, and some new switch ("-n" maybe) would be needed if you didn't want it to wait. Comments? regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Switch pg_ctl's default about waiting? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Switch pg_ctl's default about waiting? Peter Eisentraut
- RE: [HACKERS] Switch pg_ctl's default about waiting? Mikheev, Vadim