> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Special handling of TOAST relations during VACUUM. TOAST relations
> >> are vacuumed while the lock on the master table is still active.
>
> > It seems very dangerous to me.
> > When VACUUM of a master table was finished, the transaction is
> > in already committed state in many cases.
>
> I don't see the problem. If the toast table doesn't get vacuumed,
> no real harm is done other than failing to recover space.
>
Hmm,is there any good reason to vacuum toast table in the
transaction which was already internally committed by vacuum
of the master table ? Is it possible under WAL ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (comma... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/comman... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/co... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backen... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/b... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/s... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgs... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgs... Hiroshi Inoue
- [HACKERS] Is VACUUM still cras... Tom Lane