On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:24:59PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I would try unrolling the loop some (if possible) and retesting. The inner loop was already unrolled, but was only processing single bytes at a time. By loading in 32-bit words at once, it reduced the cost to only 7 cycles per byte (from 13). -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Erich