Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> VACUUM of a toast table crashed immediately after the movement
> of a tuple(and before inserting corresponding index tuples).
> Unfortunately the movement of a tuple is directly committed in
> already committed state but corresponding index tuples aren't
> inserted.
Ah, *now* I see what you're talking about. You're right, the TOAST
table has to be vacuumed under a separate transaction number.
I still don't like releasing the lock on the master table though.
VACUUM cheats on the commit already, could it start a new transaction
number without releasing the lock?
regards, tom lane
