Tom Lane writes: > I take it from the smiley that you're not serious, but actually it seems > like it might not be a bad idea. I could see appending a CRC to each > tuple record. Comments anyone? I think I missed the point here. With CRC you typically want to detect data corruption. Where's the possible source of corruption here? -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Bruce Momjian