Tom Lane writes:
> > if (sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(Oid) && cvt > UINT_MAX)
>
> Hm. Each part of that will generate "expression is always false"
> warnings from certain overprotective compilers.
Any compiler that does this will certainly issue a boatload of these all
over the tree. More generally, I have given up on worrying too much about
the warning count on non-GCC compilers. All the ones I've seen lately
generate tons already.
> A more serious problem is that using UINT_MAX assumes that Oid is
> unsigned int, which will certainly not be true forever --- but the
> required change will be easily missed when Oid changes.
>
> Perhaps postgres_ext.h could define
>
> #define OID_MAX UINT_MAX
>
> right below the typedef for Oid, and then we could do this in oidin():
>
> #if OID_MAX < ULONG_MAX
> if (cvt > OID_MAX)
> elog();
> #endif
That looks fine as well.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
