Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can this now be marked as done? > * Modification of pg_class can happen while table in use by another > backend. Might lead to MVCC inside of syscache I'm not sure. Do you have any record of what the concern was, in detail? I don't understand what the TODO item is trying to say. regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proof against cache-inval prob... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proof against cache-i... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proof against cache-i... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proof against cache-i... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proof against cac... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proof against... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proof aga... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proo... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Well, we seem to be proo... Bruce Momjian