Re: [HACKERS] UNDER?

[Hannu Krosing]

"Robert B. Easter" wrote:
> 
> Is UNDER being stripped out for 7.1?  I'm looking at documentation and don't
> want to write about it if it won't be in there.

Thats' how I understand the outcome of a discussion about 1 week ago
here: 

Tom Lane wrote on Tue Jan  2 20:19:18 2001:
> Anyway, we seem to have a clear consensus to pull the UNDER clause from
> the grammar and stick with INHERITS for 7.1.  I will take care of that
> in the next day or so.

------------------
Hannu