> The RelFileNodeEquals() bug we found on Monday proves that no one had > yet done enough stress-testing on 7.1 to discover that multiple > databases were broken. Think about that for awhile before > you campaign for inserting untested new features at this point. > We need to focus on TESTING, people, not new features. I mostly sure that Oleg' changes touch *only* gist subdir (Oleg?) so *nothing* will be broken in other areas. That's why I don't object new gist in 7.1. RelFileNodeEquals is quite another thing, thanks for fix again -:) Vadim
- AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST fo... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiS... Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Oleg Bartunov
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST fo... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiS... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiS... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Tom Lane