"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Actually, I'd expect the CRC check to catch an all-zeroes page (if
>> it fails to complain, then you misimplemented the CRC), so that would
>> be the place to deal with it now.

> I've used standard CRC32 implementation you pointed me to -:)
> But CRC is used in WAL records only.

Oh.  I thought we'd agreed that a CRC on each stored disk block would
be a good idea as well.  I take it you didn't do that.

Do we want to consider doing this (and forcing another initdb)?
Or shall we say "too late for 7.1"?

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to