"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Actually, I'd expect the CRC check to catch an all-zeroes page (if >> it fails to complain, then you misimplemented the CRC), so that would >> be the place to deal with it now. > I've used standard CRC32 implementation you pointed me to -:) > But CRC is used in WAL records only. Oh. I thought we'd agreed that a CRC on each stored disk block would be a good idea as well. I take it you didn't do that. Do we want to consider doing this (and forcing another initdb)? Or shall we say "too late for 7.1"? regards, tom lane