> > Yes, the annoyance is, that localtime works for dates before 1970 > > but mktime doesn't. Best would probably be to assume no DST before > > 1970 on AIX and IRIX. > > That seems like a reasonable answer to me, especially since we have > other platforms that behave that way. How can we do this --- just > test for isdst = -1 after the call, and assume that means failure? Since we have tests of the form (tm_isdst > 0) ? ... in other parts of the code this would imho be sufficient. BTW, I would use the above check for DST in all parts of the code. Currently we eighter have (tm_isdst ? ....) or the above form. Andreas
- AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator prob... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - oper... Thomas Lockhart
- AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - operator... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterval - ... Pete Forman
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tinterva... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: tint... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re:... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS]... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACK... Peter Eisentraut