Lamar Owen writes: > It's pretty dramatic to get the 'You don't have permissions to install' > message from the perl 'make install' when I am performing the build (and > the make install) as root. Particularly when 7.0's perl 'make install' > worked semi-properly. I say semi-properly because the packing list had > to be rewritten -- but at least the install did its job to the proper > build-root'ed location. Then we apparently have a problem here. I can only say "works here", and I verified against the MakeMaker internals that things work as designed. What does 'gmake -f Makefile echo-installdir' show? Is it the location you'd expect, and do you really have write access to that location? Maybe a shell problem in GNUmakefile? I'm sitting at a RH 7.0 system and when I wrote this code I was using 5.2, so I must suspect that you are doing something that voids the warranty. ;-) -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Michael J Schout
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
- RPMs (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bet... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: RPMs (was Re: [HACKERS] Re:... Lamar Owen
- Re: RPMs (was Re: [HACKERS] Re:... Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] Re: RPMs (was Re: Re:... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: RPMs (was Re: Re:... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: RPMs (was Re: Re:... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Michael J Schout
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Beta2 ... ? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 ... ? Peter Eisentraut