Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes, definitely --- see the sole use of that macro, in outfuncs.c. > Maybe this macro could be removed and expanded in place. That would make > things more transparent. Or is there any other potential use? No objection from me. The macro clearly failed to make things better in that usage, and offhand I think it would be just as likely to be a time bomb in any other usage. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Bruce Momjian