Tom Lane writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> Er, what will you ifdef exactly,
>
> > + #ifdef __cplusplus
#ifndef, I meant. I.e., only declare it when in C, since libpq++ does not
use it. libpq doesn't use it either, but it uses tons of strerror().
> > #ifdef HAVE_SYS_NERR
> > extern int sys_nerr;
> > #endif
> > + #endif
>
> >> and what are the odds that it will fail on some other platform?
>
> > I don't see how it would fail. At least it won't add more possible
> > failure cases.
>
> If that can't fail, why do we need to provide a declaration of sys_nerr
> at all?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
