> > Would be something for a STATEMENT trigger. We don't have 'em
> > yet and I'm not sure what kind of information they will
> > receive if we finally implement them. But the number of rows
> > affected by the statement is a good candidate.
>
> That's no help for a 7.1 solution however. We can't start inventing
> a new feature at this stage.
>
> What I am inclined to do is have the rewriter reject conditional rules
> that contain NOTIFY. That seems like the minimal restriction that will
> prevent a crash or incorrect behavior. Comments?
OK, added to TODO:
* Allow NOTIFY in rules
and removed from open items list.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
