Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jan Wieck writes:
>
> > Exactly the way you want it to do (open(2) and close(2) of a
> > UNIX domain socket) was what I had to do to get an old
> > Mach3-4.3BSD combo into a kernel-panic.
>
> The lock file is an ordinary file.
So the crazy-temp-vacuum-cleaner on linux doesn't touch the
sockets?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gon... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock fil... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the loc... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the... Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough,... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is gon... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock file is... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the lock fil... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the loc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, the... Ross J. Reedstrom
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is... GB Clark II
