Lamar Owen wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > It's spelled PGHOST as of 7.1 ... but the discussion here is about what > > the default behavior of an installation will be, not what you can > > override it to do. > I'm talking about Unix domain socket location, not TCP/IP hostname, > which PGHOST is, right? Found the code in fe-connect.c that changes that assumption.....sorry for my high density :-). -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Florent Guillaume
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone Oliver Elphick