Re: [HACKERS] Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone

[Tom Lane]

Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But my issue is that libpq or any other client should be smart enough to
> not have to assume the location.

Er, how do you propose to do that?  The client cannot learn the correct
location from the postmaster --- it must figure out *on its own* where
the socket file is.  AFAICS you can't avoid having hardwired knowledge
about how to do that in the client.

You or somebody else previously suggested hardwiring the location of
a configuration file, rather than the socketfile itself, but I can't
see that that really improves matters in this context.  In particular,
changing to such a method would still break backwards compatibility.

                        regards, tom lane