Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gist__int_ops | 1007
> gist__intbig_ops | 1007
> we want gist__int_ops to be default index opclass.
> If we delete gist__intbig_ops entry from opclass, then we couldn't use
> gist__intbig_ops !
Put in gist__intbig_ops with zero for the default type. You should
never have more than one entry in pg_opclass claiming to be the default
for a given type OID.
regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-int... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarray Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-intarra... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contrib-int... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of contri... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] new version of co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] new version o... Oleg Bartunov
- [HACKERS] New version of co... Oleg Bartunov
- [HACKERS] Re: New version o... Tom Lane
