> The man page suggests that nohup is required to init postmaster, I > know this isn't true but to implement an example init file and not > match up with the man page seemed foolish. > > I guess nohup would stop postmaster doing something awfull if it > doesn't handle HUP properly but I very much doubt that you guys fail > to handle HUP. Good point. postmaster in 7.1 uses HUP signal to re-read postgresql.conf. It seems we should not use nohup to start postmaster. -- Tatsuo Ishii
- [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken... Nic Ferrier
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup br... Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging ... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog log... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] syslog logging setup broken... Nic Ferrier
- Tatsuo Ishii