> Might it be, that pg_control is older than it should be ? > I mean, that the write to pg_control did not make it to disk, > but the checkpoint already completed (removed the logs) ? Well, WAL does *pg_fsync()* of pg_control before removing old logs, so it's only possible if Ryan run PG with -F (fsync = off). Ryan? Vadim
- [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!! Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system cra... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after sy... Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL aft... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- RE: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system crash f... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Recovery of PGSQL after system cra... Ryan Kirkpatrick
- [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL afte... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL afte... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of PGSQL... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of P... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recovery of P... Ryan Kirkpatrick