Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, this clearly is a release-stopper because we don't want to release
> a non-standard GET DIAGNOSTICS. It will be fixed before 7.1 final by
> someone. I have added it to the open items list.
Done.
I ended up using RESULT_OID for the keyword that wasn't specified by
SQL99, after I realized that it actually *is* a keyword in the plpgsql
grammar, and therefore had better not conflict with any plain
identifiers that a user might want to use. Both RESULT and OID look
mighty dangerous from that perspective.
regards, tom lane
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items) Philip Warner
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items) Bruce Momjian
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 ite... Tom Lane
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1... Bruce Momjian
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS] Open... Tom Lane
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS]... Bruce Momjian
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS]... Bruce Momjian
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items) Tom Lane
- Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.1 items) Jan Wieck
