> I think the idea of making a user-settable format string is a good one. > I'm just afraid of the idea of trying to shoehorn in a solution at the > last minute; if we do, we may find it's not quite right and then have > a backwards-compatibility problem with fixing it. Besides, we are in > "no new features" mode during beta. I think it should wait for 7.2. Agreed. I have the items on the TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representation Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point repres... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point re... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Pete Forman
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point repres... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point re... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point re... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: floating point re... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] floating point representat... Peter Eisentraut