Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance

[Tatsuo Ishii]

> I didn't much like that approach to altering the test, since it also
> means that all the clients are working with separate tables and hence
> not able to share read I/O; that doesn't seem like it's the same
> benchmark at all.  What would make more sense to me is to increase the
> number of rows in the branches table.
> 
> Right now, at the default "scale factor" of 1, pgbench makes tables of
> these sizes:
> 
> accounts      100000
> branches      1
> history               0               (filled during test)
> tellers               10
> 
> It seems to me that the branches table should have at least 10 to 100
> entries, and tellers about 10 times whatever branches is.  100000
> accounts rows seems enough though.

Those numbers are defined in the TPC-B spec. But pgbench is not an
official test tool anyway, so you could modify it if you like.
That is the benefit of the open source:-)
--
Tatsuo Ishii