Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, I assumed the same. I posted the script; could someone else make
>> the same run? We really need more than one test case ;-)
> I could find the sciript but seem to have missed your change
> about commit_siblings. Where could I get it ?
Er ... duh ... I didn't commit it yet. Well, it's harmless enough
as long as commit_delay defaults to 0, so I'll go ahead and commit.
regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performa... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improveme... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance impro... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improveme... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] CommitDelay performance improvement Philip Warner
