Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Testing beta5 on unixware7 gives an error on int8 test while beta4 (I've > just retested it) works ok. That's odd. int8.c hasn't changed since beta3 (except in the float-to-int8 routine, which isn't involved here). Is there any difference in the src/include/config.h file generated by the two versions? regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? Olivier PRENANT
- [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Olivier PRENANT
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Olivier PRENANT
- Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? Peter Eisentraut