Re: [HACKERS] WAL & RC1 status

[Tom Lane]

Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a version number in the WAL file?

catversion.h will do fine, no?

> Can we put conditional code in there to create
> new log file records with an updated format?

The WAL stuff is *far* too complex already.  I've spent a week studying
it and I only partially understand it.  I will not consent to trying to
support multiple log file formats concurrently.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]