Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes

[Hiroshi Inoue]

Tom Lane wrote: > > "Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So, it's better to leave archdir in pg_control now - if we'll > > decide that GUC is better place then we'll just ignore archdir > > in pg_control. But if it will be better to have it in pg_control > > then we'll not be able to add it there. > > But what possible reason is there for keeping it in pg_control? > AFAICS that would just mean that we'd need special code for setting it, > instead of making use of all of Peter's hard work on GUC. > I don't think it's appropriate to edit archdir by hand. Regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl